I took my last experiment a step further and reduced the same letter down from an email to a text!
I feel like this has gone too far in abbreviating the message; a lot of meaning has been lost and it's almost incomprehensible. Perhaps it's fair to say that people communicated on a deeper level, though less frequently and easily, in the 1800s.
For me, a text is not the right format for such drastic information and too much has been discarded here. Or perhaps Carol Ann Duffy is right in claiming a text forces us to choose our words more carefully and powerfully. It could be that this text, in its brevity, is more dramatic than the email or the letter!